الإنصاف و أساليبه بين قافية المفضل النكري و سينية العباس بن مرداس

Abstract EN

Tracking and tracking meanings in the various colors of the Arabic statement, whether poetry or prose, and trying to stand on its rhetorical methods are of different importance in a place, as this is a rhetoric development
Hence, this study came: (Al-Insaf and his methods in the rhyme of Al-Nukri Al-Fakri and Siniyat Al-Abbas bin Mardas - A Balanced Rhetorical Study) an attempt to find some methods of fairness in Arabic rhetoric, an explanation of its aesthetics, and a highlight of the rhetoric of poets in employing various manifestations in the embodiment of the meanings of fairness and justice with enemies On the battlefield in particular.

The study also attempted to balance the two poets, a balance that would highlight the peculiarity of the poets' poetry: (Al-Mufaddal al-Nokri, and Abbas bin Mardas) in warfare, and try to explain the proficiency and deficiencies in the two fair.

The study also attempted to show the ranks of the different methods of fairness in the two equities, to show which was more fulfilling the purpose, and closer to achieving the intent of the poet and his goal.

Moreover, the methods used to achieve the meaning of fairness varied in the two equities, so the marvelous style, the preference style, the condition of the condition, and the expert method - which is the most common - signify parity, parity and balance between friends and foes, and metaphor and metonymy are the most prominent ways that embody fairness.

Other methods of rhetoric assisted these methods, which were not major in fairness, as well as the role of verbal expressions in the embodiment of the meanings of fairness, which the two poets were best selected and employed, a choice that predicts an accurate understanding of the characteristics of these terms, and the indications of those structures.