![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
The Weight-Inclusive versus Weight-Normative Approach to Health: Evaluating the Evidence for Prioritizing Well-Being over Weight Loss
المؤلفون المشاركون
Annunziato, Rachel
Davis, Chad
Tylka, Tracy L.
Burgard, Deb
Daníelsdóttir, Sigrún
Shuman, Ellen
Calogero, Rachel M.
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2014، العدد 2014 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2014)، ص ص. 1-18، 18ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2014-07-23
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
18
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Using an ethical lens, this review evaluates two methods of working within patient care and public health: the weight-normative approach (emphasis on weight and weight loss when defining health and well-being) and the weight-inclusive approach (emphasis on viewing health and well-being as multifaceted while directing efforts toward improving health access and reducing weight stigma).
Data reveal that the weight-normative approach is not effective for most people because of high rates of weight regain and cycling from weight loss interventions, which are linked to adverse health and well-being.
Its predominant focus on weight may also foster stigma in health care and society, and data show that weight stigma is also linked to adverse health and well-being.
In contrast, data support a weight-inclusive approach, which is included in models such as Health at Every Size for improving physical (e.g., blood pressure), behavioral (e.g., binge eating), and psychological (e.g., depression) indices, as well as acceptability of public health messages.
Therefore, the weight-inclusive approach upholds nonmaleficience and beneficience, whereas the weight-normative approach does not.
We offer a theoretical framework that organizes the research included in this review and discuss how it can guide research efforts and help health professionals intervene with their patients and community.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Tylka, Tracy L.& Annunziato, Rachel& Burgard, Deb& Daníelsdóttir, Sigrún& Shuman, Ellen& Davis, Chad…[et al.]. 2014. The Weight-Inclusive versus Weight-Normative Approach to Health: Evaluating the Evidence for Prioritizing Well-Being over Weight Loss. Journal of Obesity،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1042401
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Tylka, Tracy L.…[et al.]. The Weight-Inclusive versus Weight-Normative Approach to Health: Evaluating the Evidence for Prioritizing Well-Being over Weight Loss. Journal of Obesity No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1042401
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Tylka, Tracy L.& Annunziato, Rachel& Burgard, Deb& Daníelsdóttir, Sigrún& Shuman, Ellen& Davis, Chad…[et al.]. The Weight-Inclusive versus Weight-Normative Approach to Health: Evaluating the Evidence for Prioritizing Well-Being over Weight Loss. Journal of Obesity. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1042401
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1042401
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)