Comparison of the Disposable Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway and the Disposable I-gel in Anaesthetized, Paralyzed Adults: A Randomized Prospective Study
المؤلفون المشاركون
EL-Radaideh, Khaled
Alhowary, Ala"a
Bani Hani, Diab
المصدر
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
العدد
المجلد 2015، العدد 2015 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2015)، ص ص. 1-8، 8ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2015-12-01
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
8
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Introduction.
This study compared streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) and I-gel noninflatable, single-use, supraglottic airway device (SAD) performance in anesthetized, paralyzed adults.
Methods.
Eighty adults (ASA physical statuses I–III) who were undergoing elective procedures under general anesthesia with an SAD were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, single-blind study.
Subjects were randomly and evenly assigned to the SLIPA or I-gel group for intraoperative airway management.
Ease and number of insertions, insertion time, oropharyngeal sealing pressure, hemodynamic response, oxygen saturation (SpO2), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), and peri- and postoperative complications were examined.
Results.
The SLIPA and I-gel devices were successfully inserted in 100% and 95% of subjects, respectively.
In two I-gel subjects (5%), ventilation was not possible after two attempts, but a size 55 SLIPA was successfully inserted in both cases.
Forty-two and 38 patients were ultimately included in the SLIPA and I-gel groups, respectively.
Insertion time was significantly shorter with the SLIPA ( 11.19 ± 3.03 s) than with the I-gel ( 15.05 ± 6.37 s, P = 0.003 ).
Oropharyngeal sealing pressure was significantly higher in SLIPA ( 28.76 ± 3.11 cmH2O) than in I-gel ( 25.9 ± 3.65 cmH2O) subjects ( P = 0.001 ).
Blood staining occurred more frequently in SLIPA ( n = 8 , 19.0%) than in I-gel ( n = 5 , 13.2%) patients ( P < 0.01 ).
Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, SpO2, and EtCO2 were not significantly different between groups.
Conclusion.
Although blood staining incidence was higher, SLIPA insertion was easier and faster than I-gel insertion.
The SLIPA provided better airway sealing pressure.
Both devices had similar mechanical ventilation and oxygenation characteristics and comparable hemodynamic stability.
Both noninflatable SADs are useful, but SLIPA rapid insertion and good airway sealing make it an effective alternative to the I-gel.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
EL-Radaideh, Khaled& Alhowary, Ala"a& Bani Hani, Diab. 2015. Comparison of the Disposable Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway and the Disposable I-gel in Anaesthetized, Paralyzed Adults: A Randomized Prospective Study. Anesthesiology Research and Practice،Vol. 2015, no. 2015, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1053955
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
EL-Radaideh, Khaled…[et al.]. Comparison of the Disposable Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway and the Disposable I-gel in Anaesthetized, Paralyzed Adults: A Randomized Prospective Study. Anesthesiology Research and Practice No. 2015 (2015), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1053955
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
EL-Radaideh, Khaled& Alhowary, Ala"a& Bani Hani, Diab. Comparison of the Disposable Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway and the Disposable I-gel in Anaesthetized, Paralyzed Adults: A Randomized Prospective Study. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2015. Vol. 2015, no. 2015, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1053955
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1053955
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر