A Randomized Comparison Simulating Face to Face Endotracheal Intubation of Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC Video Laryngoscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope

الملخص EN

Objectives.

Early airway management is very important for severely ill patients.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of face to face intubation in four different types of laryngoscopes (Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax airway scope (AWS), Glidescope video laryngoscope (GVL), and C-MAC video laryngoscope (C-MAC)).

Method.

Ninety-five nurses and emergency medical technicians were trained to use the AWS, C-MAC, GVL and Macintosh laryngoscope with standard airway trainer manikin and face to face intubation.

We compared VCET (vocal cord exposure time), tube pass time, 1st ventilation time, VCET to tube pass time, tube pass time to 1st ventilation time, and POGO (percentage of glottis opening) score.

In addition, we compared success rate according to the number of attempts and complications.

Result.

VCET was similar among all laryngoscopes and POGO score was higher in AWS.

AWS and Macintosh blade were faster than GVL and C-MAC in total intubation time.

Face to face intubation success rate was lower in GVL than other laryngoscopes.

Conclusion.

AWS and Macintosh were favorable laryngoscopes in face to face intubation.

GVL had disadvantage performing face to face intubation.