Comparative Orbital Volumes between a Single Incisional Approach and a Double Incisional Approach in Patients with Combined Blowout Fracture
المؤلفون المشاركون
Seo, Bommie F.
Han, Hyun Ho
Moon, Suk-Ho
Oh, Deuk Young
Ahn, Sang Tae
Park, Sang Wook
Rhie, Jong Won
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2015، العدد 2015 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2015)، ص ص. 1-6، 6ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2015-04-16
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
6
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Purpose.
Blowout fracture characterized by concurrent floor and medial wall fractures is a rare entity.
We compared surgical outcomes between a single approach and a double approach in patients with orbital fracture by measuring the postoperative orbital volume.
Methods.
We confirmed that 21 (8.5%) of a total of 246 patients with orbital fractures had fractures of the medial wall and floor through a retrospective chart review.
Of these, 10 patients underwent the single approach and the remaining 11 patients had the double approach.
We performed a statistical analysis of changes between the preoperative and postoperative orbital volumes at a 6-month follow-up.
Results.
Compared with the contralateral, nonaffected side, the orbital volume was 115.3 (±6.09)% preoperatively and 106.5 (±6.15)% postoperatively in the single approach group and 118.2 (±11.16)% preoperatively and 108.6 (±13.96)% postoperatively in the double approach.
These results indicated that there was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative orbital volumes in each group (P<0.05).
However there was no significant difference between the single approach and the double approach (P>0.05).
Conclusions.
Our results showed that there were no significant differences in surgical outcomes between the two modalities.
The treatment modality may be selected based on the surgeons’ preference, as well as the fracture type.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Han, Hyun Ho& Park, Sang Wook& Moon, Suk-Ho& Seo, Bommie F.& Rhie, Jong Won& Ahn, Sang Tae…[et al.]. 2015. Comparative Orbital Volumes between a Single Incisional Approach and a Double Incisional Approach in Patients with Combined Blowout Fracture. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2015, no. 2015, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1057480
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Han, Hyun Ho…[et al.]. Comparative Orbital Volumes between a Single Incisional Approach and a Double Incisional Approach in Patients with Combined Blowout Fracture. BioMed Research International No. 2015 (2015), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1057480
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Han, Hyun Ho& Park, Sang Wook& Moon, Suk-Ho& Seo, Bommie F.& Rhie, Jong Won& Ahn, Sang Tae…[et al.]. Comparative Orbital Volumes between a Single Incisional Approach and a Double Incisional Approach in Patients with Combined Blowout Fracture. BioMed Research International. 2015. Vol. 2015, no. 2015, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1057480
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1057480
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر