الحجاج و البذاءة : مقاربة تداولية بلاغية لتعليقات الجمهور على "اليوتيوب"

الملخص EN

The written language of ordinary individuals in the virtual space raises many rhetoric and linguistic issues in particular.

This research attempts to explore some linguistic and rhetorical features of a particular type of audience speech in interactive media, which is commentary on political events transmitted through YouTube.

The research material consists of public comments on broadcasting a debate between Mr.

Amr Moussa and Dr.

Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh in the first phase of the presidential elections in 2012.

It is a blog written from 4886 comments on two different broadcasts of the debate on YouTube.

One is a full live broadcast, and the other is a recording of excerpts.

The choice of this blog is due to the large volume of comments and the synchronization of most of them with the broadcast of the event, which guarantees a greater degree of spontaneity and automaticity.

The research focuses on addressing two phenomena, namely the nature of the arguments used in the comments, and the prevalence of the language of indecency from a deliberative rhetorical perspective.

He argues that communication across virtual spaces poses several challenges to some of the stable ideas about these two phenomena.