![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Coronary Angiography Safety between Transradial and Transfemoral Access
المؤلفون المشاركون
Sinha, Santosh Kumar
Mishra, Vikas
Afdaali, Nasar
Jha, Mukesh Jitendra
Kumar, Ashutosh
Asif, Mohammad
Thakur, Ramesh
Varma, Chandra Mohan
المصدر
Cardiology Research and Practice
العدد
المجلد 2016، العدد 2016 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2016)، ص ص. 1-7، 7ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2016-11-03
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
7
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Background and Aim.
The aim of study was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and procedural variables of transradial approach compared with transfemoral approach in a standard population of patients undergoing coronary catheterization as one of the major criticisms of the transradial approach is that it takes longer overall procedure and fluoroscopy time, thereby causing more radiation exposure.
Method.
Between January 2015 and December 2015, a total of 1,997 patients in LPS Institute of Cardiology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, UP, India, undergoing coronary catheterization were randomly assigned to the transradial or transfemoral approach.
Result.
Successful catheterization was achieved in 1045 of 1076 patients (97.1%) in the transradial group and in 918 of 921 patients (99.7%) in the transfemoral group (p=0.001).
Comparing the transradial and transfemoral approaches, fluoroscopy time (2.46±1.22 versus 2.83±1.31 min; p=0.32), procedure time (8.89±2.72 versus 9.33±2.82 min; p=0.56), contrast volume (67.52±22.54 versus 71.63±25.41 mL; p=0.32), radiation dose as dose area product (24.2±4.21 versus 22.3±3.46 Gycm2; p=0.43), and postprocedural rise of serum creatinine (6±4.5% versus 8±2.6%; p=0.41) were not significantly different while vascular access site complications were significantly lower in transradial group than transfemoral group (3.9% versus 7.6%; p=0.04).
Conclusion.
The present study shows that transradial access for coronary angiography is safe among patients compared to transfemoral access with lower rate of local vascular complications.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Sinha, Santosh Kumar& Mishra, Vikas& Afdaali, Nasar& Jha, Mukesh Jitendra& Kumar, Ashutosh& Asif, Mohammad…[et al.]. 2016. Coronary Angiography Safety between Transradial and Transfemoral Access. Cardiology Research and Practice،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103283
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Sinha, Santosh Kumar…[et al.]. Coronary Angiography Safety between Transradial and Transfemoral Access. Cardiology Research and Practice No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103283
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Sinha, Santosh Kumar& Mishra, Vikas& Afdaali, Nasar& Jha, Mukesh Jitendra& Kumar, Ashutosh& Asif, Mohammad…[et al.]. Coronary Angiography Safety between Transradial and Transfemoral Access. Cardiology Research and Practice. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103283
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1103283
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)