Laparoscopic versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
المؤلفون المشاركون
Shelat, Vishalkumar Girishchandra
Lee, Daniel Jin Keat
Ye, MaDong
Sun, Keith Haozhe
Koura, Aaryan
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2016، العدد 2016 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2016)، ص ص. 1-7، 7ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2016-09-19
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
7
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Introduction.
The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open omental patch repair (LOPR versus OR) in patients with similar presentation of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU).
The secondary aim was to evaluate the outcomes according to the severity of peritonitis.
Methods.
All patients who underwent omental patch repair at two university-affiliated institutes between January 2010 and December 2014 were reviewed.
Matched cohort between LOPR and OR groups was achieved by only including patients that had ulcer perforation <2 cm in size and symptoms occurring <48 hours.
Outcome measures were defined in accordance with length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and mortality.
Results.
148 patients met the predefined inclusion criteria with LOPR performed in 40 patients.
Outcome measures consistently support laparoscopic approach but only length of hospital stay (LOS) achieved statistical significance (LOPR 4 days versus OR 5 days, p<0.01).
In a subgroup analysis of patients with MPI score >21, LOPR is also shown to benefit, particularly resulting in significant shorter LOS (4 days versus 11 days, p<0.01).
Conclusion.
LOPR offers improved short-term outcomes in patients who present within 48 hours and with perforation size <2 cm.
LOPR also proved to be more beneficial in high MPI cases.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Lee, Daniel Jin Keat& Ye, MaDong& Sun, Keith Haozhe& Shelat, Vishalkumar Girishchandra& Koura, Aaryan. 2016. Laparoscopic versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study. Surgery Research and Practice،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118459
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Lee, Daniel Jin Keat…[et al.]. Laparoscopic versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study. Surgery Research and Practice No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118459
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Lee, Daniel Jin Keat& Ye, MaDong& Sun, Keith Haozhe& Shelat, Vishalkumar Girishchandra& Koura, Aaryan. Laparoscopic versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study. Surgery Research and Practice. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118459
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1118459
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر