Achieving the Recommended Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure: A Randomized Control Study Comparing Loss of Resistance Syringe to Pilot Balloon Palpation
المؤلفون المشاركون
Kwizera, Arthur
Ssemogerere, Lameck
Wabule, Agnes
Bulamba, Fred
Kintu, Andrew
Ayupo, Nodreen
Kojjo, Charles
المصدر
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
العدد
المجلد 2017، العدد 2017 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2017)، ص ص. 1-7، 7ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2017-12-31
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
7
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Background.
Both under- and overinflation of endotracheal tube cuffs can result in significant harm to the patient.
The optimal technique for establishing and maintaining safe cuff pressures (20–30 cmH2O) is the cuff pressure manometer, but this is not widely available, especially in resource-limited settings where its use is limited by cost of acquisition and maintenance.
Therefore, anesthesia providers commonly rely on subjective methods to estimate safe endotracheal cuff pressure.
This study set out to determine the efficacy of the loss of resistance syringe method at estimating endotracheal cuff pressures.
Methods.
This was a randomized clinical trial.
We enrolled adult patients scheduled to undergo general anesthesia for elective surgery at Mulago Hospital, Uganda.
Study participants were randomized to have their endotracheal cuff pressures estimated by either loss of resistance syringe or pilot balloon palpation.
The pressures measured were recorded.
Results.
One hundred seventy-eight patients were analyzed.
66.3% (59/89) of patients in the loss of resistance group had cuff pressures in the recommended range compared with 22.5% (20/89) from the pilot balloon palpation method.
This was statistically significant.
Conclusion.
The loss of resistance syringe method was superior to pilot balloon palpation at administering pressures in the recommended range.
This method provides a viable option to cuff inflation.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Bulamba, Fred& Kintu, Andrew& Ayupo, Nodreen& Kojjo, Charles& Ssemogerere, Lameck& Wabule, Agnes…[et al.]. 2017. Achieving the Recommended Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure: A Randomized Control Study Comparing Loss of Resistance Syringe to Pilot Balloon Palpation. Anesthesiology Research and Practice،Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1125489
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Bulamba, Fred…[et al.]. Achieving the Recommended Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure: A Randomized Control Study Comparing Loss of Resistance Syringe to Pilot Balloon Palpation. Anesthesiology Research and Practice No. 2017 (2017), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1125489
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Bulamba, Fred& Kintu, Andrew& Ayupo, Nodreen& Kojjo, Charles& Ssemogerere, Lameck& Wabule, Agnes…[et al.]. Achieving the Recommended Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure: A Randomized Control Study Comparing Loss of Resistance Syringe to Pilot Balloon Palpation. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2017. Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1125489
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1125489
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر