![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Comparison of Outcomes between Two Methods to Extract Stone Fragments during Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
المؤلفون المشاركون
Matsuzaki, Junichi
Tabei, Tadashi
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Ito, Hiroki
Kawahara, Takashi
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2018، العدد 2018 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2018)، ص ص. 1-8، 8ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2018-05-30
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
8
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Objectives.
To retrospectively compare the operative and clinical outcomes of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) with stone extraction performed either by a surgeon (SE) who manipulates the retrieval basket or by having the surgical assistant (AE) manipulate the retrieval basket with the aim of clarifying which method provides a greater stone-free postoperative status.
Methods.
The study group consisted of patients who underwent fURSL with SE or AE at our institution between April 2015 and December 2016.
Demographic, clinical, stone, and operative variables were compared between the two groups.
Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with a stone-free and non-stone-free status postoperatively.
Results.
Our analysis included 196 cases of renal stones treated using fURSL, with 109 who underwent AE and 87 who underwent SE.
The rate of stone-free status was higher for the SE group (90.8%) than for the AE group (61.5%; P<0.001).
The method of extraction was identified as an independent predictor of stone-free status (P<0.001, odds ratio (SE compared to AE), 9.133, 95% confidence interval, 3.736–22.322).
Conclusion.
The stone-free rate is improved by having the surgeon perform the stone extraction as part of the fURSL procedure.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Tabei, Tadashi& Ito, Hiroki& Kobayashi, Kazuki& Kawahara, Takashi& Matsuzaki, Junichi. 2018. Comparison of Outcomes between Two Methods to Extract Stone Fragments during Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1126714
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Tabei, Tadashi…[et al.]. Comparison of Outcomes between Two Methods to Extract Stone Fragments during Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. BioMed Research International No. 2018 (2018), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1126714
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Tabei, Tadashi& Ito, Hiroki& Kobayashi, Kazuki& Kawahara, Takashi& Matsuzaki, Junichi. Comparison of Outcomes between Two Methods to Extract Stone Fragments during Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. BioMed Research International. 2018. Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1126714
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1126714
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)