Immediate Loading of Implant-Supported Single Crowns after Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

الملخص EN

Aim.

To compare implant survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of immediately loaded single implants inserted by using ultrasonic implant site preparation (UISP) (test) and conventional rotary instrumentation (control).

Methods.

Two single implants were inserted for each patient: after randomization, test site was prepared by using an ultrasonic device (Piezosurgery Touch, Mectron, Italy) and control site was prepared by using the drills of the selected implant system (Premium AZT, Sweden & Martina, Italy), until reaching a final diameter of 3 mm in both groups.

Identical implants (3.8x11.5 mm) were inserted in all sites at crestal level.

Impressions were taken and screwed resin single crowns with platform-switched provisional abutments were delivered with 48 hours.

Periapical radiographs were taken at provisional crown insertion (T0), 6 months (T1) and one year (T2) after prosthetic loading to measure MBL.

All data were tested for normality and subsequently analyzed by paired samples t-test and forward multiple linear regression.

Results.

Forty-eight patients were treated in six centers with the insertion of ninety-six implants (48 test; 48 control).

Four implants in four patients failed within the first six months of healing (two in test group; two in control group; no difference between groups).

Forty patients (age 60.1±10.7 years; 22 female, 18 male) were included in the final analysis.

Mean MBL after six months of loading was 1.39±1.03 mm in the test group and 1.42±1.16 mm in the control group (p>0.05) and after one year was 1.92±1.14 mm and 2.14±1.55 mm in test and control, respectively (p>0.05).

Conclusions.

No differences in survival rate and MBL were demonstrated between UISP and conventional site preparation with rotary instruments in immediately loaded dental implants: UISP, with its characteristics of enhanced surgical control and safety in proximity of delicate structures, may be used as a reliable alternative to the traditional drilling systems.