Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies

المؤلفون المشاركون

Bellocq, David
Mathis, Thibaud
Kodjikian, Laurent

المصدر

BioMed Research International

العدد

المجلد 2018، العدد 2018 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2018)، ص ص. 1-16، 16ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2018-08-28

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

16

التخصصات الرئيسية

الطب البشري

الملخص EN

Objectives of the Study.

Summary of observational studies concerning the pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods.

A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database on 1 February 2018 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and dexamethasone (DEX) implants for DME.

Studies with more than 10 patients and follow-up of more than 6 months were selected.

Analyses were carried out on the overall population and on subgroups defined according to baseline visual acuity (BVA) and the patients’ naïve or non-naïve status.

Results.

Thirty-two studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and 31 studies evaluating the efficacy of DEX-implants were retained, concerning 6,842 and 1,703 eyes, respectively.

A mean gain of +4.7 letters for a mean of 5.8 injections (mean follow-up: 15.6 months) and +9.6 letters for a mean of 1.6 injections (10.3 months) was found in the anti-VEGF and DEX-implant studies, respectively.

Final VA appears to be similar for both treatment (62 letters for anti-VEGF, 61.2 letters for DEX-implant), and BVA appears lower for DEX-implant, which may partially explain the greater visual gain.

The DEX-implant studies show greater gains in VA compared to the anti-VEGF studies, especially for higher BVA.

Indeed, mean gains for the subgroups of patients with BVA<50 letters, 5060 letters are +4.3, +5.8, and +3.1 letters, respectively, in the anti-VEGF studies and +10.5, +9.3, and +8.8 letters, respectively, in the DEX-implant studies.

Regarding the patient’s initial status, only naïve status appears to confer the best functional response in DEX-implant studies.

Conclusion.

Observational studies investigating DEX-implant report clinically similar final VA when compared to anti-VEGF, but superior visual gains in real-life practice.

This latter difference could be due to the better BVA, but also to the fact that less injections were administered in the anti-VEGF observational studies than in the interventional studies.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Kodjikian, Laurent& Bellocq, David& Mathis, Thibaud. 2018. Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-16.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129029

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Kodjikian, Laurent…[et al.]. Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies. BioMed Research International No. 2018 (2018), pp.1-16.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129029

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Kodjikian, Laurent& Bellocq, David& Mathis, Thibaud. Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies. BioMed Research International. 2018. Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-16.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129029

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-1129029