Outcomes of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Their Predictors: A National Cohort

المؤلفون المشاركون

Taha, Ahmed
Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko
Abugroun, Ashraf
Mohammedzein, Assad
Naguib, M. Tarek
Patel, Manish

المصدر

Critical Care Research and Practice

العدد

المجلد 2019، العدد 2019 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2019)، ص ص. 1-8، 8ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2019-09-18

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

8

التخصصات الرئيسية

الطب البشري

الملخص EN

Rationale.

Although noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is increasingly used in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), the data supporting its benefit for this indication are lacking.

Objectives.

To analyze the all-cause in-hospital mortality rate and length of stay (LOS) for ARDS patients who received NIPPV in the United States (US) compared to those who were initially intubated.

Our secondary outcome of interest was to determine the predicting factors for NIPPV failure.

Methods.

We used the 2016 National Inpatient Sample database to identify 4,277 adult records with ARDS who required positive pressure ventilation.

We divided the cohort into initial treatment with IMV or NIPPV.

Then, the NIPPV group was further subdivided into NIPPV failure or success.

We defined NIPPV failure as same-patient use of NIPPV and IMV either on the same day or using IMV at a later date.

We analyzed the in-hospital mortality, LOS, and NIPPV failure rate.

Linear regression of log-transformed LOS and logistic regression of binary outcomes were used to test for associations.

Results.

The NIPPV success group had the lowest mortality rate (4.9% [3.8, 6.4]) and the shortest LOS (7 days [6.6, 7.5]).

The NIPPV failure rate was 21%.

Sepsis, pneumonia, and chronic liver disease were associated with higher odds of NIPPV failure (adjusted OR: 4.47, 2.65, and 2.23, respectively).

There was no significant difference between NIPPV failure and IMV groups in-hospital mortality (26.9% [21.8, 32.8] vs.

25.1% [23.5, 26.9], p=0.885) or LOS (16 [14, 18] vs.

15.6 [15, 16.3], p=0.926).

Conclusions.

NIPPV success in ARDS exhibits significantly lower hospital mortality rates and shorter LOS compared with IMV, and NIPPV failure exhibits no significant difference in hospital mortality or LOS compared with patients who were initially intubated.

Therefore, an initial trial of NIPPV may be considered in ARDS.

Sepsis, pneumonia, and chronic liver disease were associated with higher odds of NIPPV failure; these factors should be used to stratify patients to the most suitable ventilation modality.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Taha, Ahmed& Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko& Abugroun, Ashraf& Mohammedzein, Assad& Naguib, M. Tarek& Patel, Manish. 2019. Outcomes of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Their Predictors: A National Cohort. Critical Care Research and Practice،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129129

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Taha, Ahmed…[et al.]. Outcomes of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Their Predictors: A National Cohort. Critical Care Research and Practice No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129129

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Taha, Ahmed& Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko& Abugroun, Ashraf& Mohammedzein, Assad& Naguib, M. Tarek& Patel, Manish. Outcomes of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Their Predictors: A National Cohort. Critical Care Research and Practice. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129129

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-1129129