Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (LSPDP) versus Open Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (OSPDP): A Comparative Study
المؤلفون المشاركون
Cai, Xiujun
Huang, Jing
Yadav, Dipesh Kumar
Xiong, Chaojie
Sheng, Ye
Zhou, Xinhua’
المصدر
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
العدد
المجلد 2019، العدد 2019 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2019)، ص ص. 1-7، 7ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2019-07-01
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
7
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Objective.
To compare outcomes between laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) and open spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (OSPDP) for treatment of benign and low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreas and evaluate feasibility and safety of LSPDP.
Methods.
The clinical data of 53 cases of LSPDP and 44 cases of OSPDP performed between January 2008 and August 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.
The clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared.
Results.
There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the two groups.
However, the LSPDP group had statistically significant shorter operative time (145.3±55.9 versus 184.7±33.5, P=0.03) and lesser intraoperative blood loss (150.6±180.8 versus 253.5±76.2, P=0.03) than that of the OSPDP group.
Moreover, the LSPDP group also had statistically significant earlier passing of first flatus (2.2±1.4 versus 3.1±1.9, P=0.01), earlier diet intake (2.3±1.8 versus 3.4±2.0, P=0.01), and shorter hospital stay (6.2±7.2 versus 8.8±9.3, 0.04) than that of the OSPDP group.
However, postoperative pancreatic fistula (P=0.64) and total postoperative complications (P=0.59) were not significantly different between the groups.
The rate of pancreatic fistula and total postoperative complications occurred in 62.5% and 64.5%, respectively, in LSPDP group and, similarly, 70% and 70.0%, respectively, in OSPDP group.
Conclusion.
This study confirms that LSPDP is safe, feasible, and superior to OSPDP in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative recovery.
Hence, it is worth popularizing LSPDP for benign and low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreas.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Huang, Jing& Yadav, Dipesh Kumar& Xiong, Chaojie& Sheng, Ye& Zhou, Xinhua’& Cai, Xiujun. 2019. Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (LSPDP) versus Open Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (OSPDP): A Comparative Study. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129956
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Huang, Jing…[et al.]. Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (LSPDP) versus Open Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (OSPDP): A Comparative Study. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129956
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Huang, Jing& Yadav, Dipesh Kumar& Xiong, Chaojie& Sheng, Ye& Zhou, Xinhua’& Cai, Xiujun. Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (LSPDP) versus Open Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (OSPDP): A Comparative Study. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129956
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1129956
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر