![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Comparing Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Category 1 and 2 Groups: Clinical Implication of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
المؤلفون المشاركون
Choe, Gheeyoung
Kim, Jung Kwon
Lee, Hak Jong
Hwang, Sung Il
Hong, Sung Kyu
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2020، العدد 2020 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2020)، ص ص. 1-7، 7ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2020-04-02
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
7
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Objectives.
To evaluate the clinicopathological differences between Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 (v2) category 1 and 2 groups.
Materials and Methods.
We retrospectively reviewed our two institutional clinical databases: (1) transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion biopsy cohort (n=706) and (2) radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort (n=1403).
Subsequently, we performed comparative analyses between PI-RADSv2 category 1 and 2 groups.
Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as the presence of Gleason score GS≥3+4 in a single biopsy core, and adverse pathology (AP) was defined as high-grade (primary Gleason pattern 4 or any pattern 5) and/or non-organ-confined disease (pT3/N1).
We also performed multivariate logistic regression analyses for AP.
Results.
In the TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy cohort, no significant differences in detection rates of all cancer (18.2% vs.
29.0%, respectively, P=0.730) or csPCa (9.1% vs.
9.9%, respectively, P=0.692) were observed between PI-RADSv2 category 1 and 2 groups.
There were no significant differences in pathologic outcomes including Gleason score (≥4+3, 21.2% vs.
29.9%, respectively, P=0.420) or detection rate of AP (27.3% vs.
33.8%, respectively, P=0.561) between the two groups in the RP cohort either.
PI-RADSv2 category 1 or 2 had no significant association with AP, even in univariate analysis (P=0.299).
Conclusions.
PI-RADSv2 categories 1 and 2 had similar performance to predict clinicopathological outcomes.
Consequently, these two categories may be unified into a single category.
Negative mpMRI does not guarantee the absence of AP, as with csPCa.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Kim, Jung Kwon& Lee, Hak Jong& Hwang, Sung Il& Choe, Gheeyoung& Hong, Sung Kyu. 2020. Comparing Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Category 1 and 2 Groups: Clinical Implication of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1132743
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Kim, Jung Kwon…[et al.]. Comparing Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Category 1 and 2 Groups: Clinical Implication of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. BioMed Research International No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1132743
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Kim, Jung Kwon& Lee, Hak Jong& Hwang, Sung Il& Choe, Gheeyoung& Hong, Sung Kyu. Comparing Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Category 1 and 2 Groups: Clinical Implication of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. BioMed Research International. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1132743
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1132743
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)