![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation versus Nissen Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Short Term: A Meta-Analysis
المؤلفون المشاركون
Chen, Ming-Yu
Zhu, Yi-Bin
Huang, Di-yu
Wu, Angela
Zhu, He-pan
Lin, Liu-mei
Cai, Xiu-jun
المصدر
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
العدد
المجلد 2017، العدد 2017 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2017)، ص ص. 1-7، 7ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2017-03-30
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
7
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Background.
The efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) and its outcomes for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) are uncertain.
Therefore, we aimed to summarize and analyze the efficacy of two treatments for GERD.
Methods.
The meta-analysis search was performed, using four databases.
All studies from 2005 to 2016 were included.
Pooled effect was calculated using either the fixed or random effects model.
Results.
A total of 4 trials included 624 patients and aimed to evaluate the differences in proton-pump inhibitor use, complications, and adverse events.
MSA had a shorter operative time (MSA and NF: RR = −18.80, 95% CI: −24.57 to −13.04, and P=0.001) and length of stay (RR = −14.21, 95% CI: −24.18 to −4.23, and P=0.005).
Similar proton-pump inhibitor use, complication (P=0.19), and severe dysphagia for dilation were shown in both groups.
Although there is no difference between the MSA and NF in the number of adverse events, the incidence of postoperative gas or bloating (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54–0.94, and P=0.02) showed significantly different results.
However, there is no significant difference in ability to belch and ability to vomit.
Conclusions.
MSA can be recommended as an alternative treatment for GERD according to their short-term studies, especially in main-features of gas-bloating, due to shorter operative time and less complication of gas or bloating.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Chen, Ming-Yu& Huang, Di-yu& Wu, Angela& Zhu, Yi-Bin& Zhu, He-pan& Lin, Liu-mei…[et al.]. 2017. Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation versus Nissen Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Short Term: A Meta-Analysis. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology،Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1141501
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Chen, Ming-Yu…[et al.]. Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation versus Nissen Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Short Term: A Meta-Analysis. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology No. 2017 (2017), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1141501
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Chen, Ming-Yu& Huang, Di-yu& Wu, Angela& Zhu, Yi-Bin& Zhu, He-pan& Lin, Liu-mei…[et al.]. Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation versus Nissen Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Short Term: A Meta-Analysis. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017. Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1141501
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1141501
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)