CPH-I and HE4 Are More Favorable Than CA125 in Differentiating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at Early Stages

المؤلفون المشاركون

Wang, Zhiheng
Tao, Xiang
Ying, Chunmei

المصدر

Disease Markers

العدد

المجلد 2019، العدد 2019 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2019)، ص ص. 1-10، 10ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2019-10-13

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

10

التخصصات الرئيسية

الأمراض

الملخص EN

Aim.

To evaluate the diagnosis value of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), and Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) at early stages for differentiating borderline ovarian tumors from epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods.

We recruited 144 borderline ovarian tumors in FIGO stages I and II (BOT I+II), 108 epithelial ovarian cancers in FIGO stages I and II (EOC I+II), and 238 benign ovarian tumor patients with surgical treatment in the retrospective study.

The concentration of HE4 and CA125 and the values of CPH-I and ROMA were assessed separately.

Results.

The HE4 level and ROMA and CPH-I values of EOC I+II were all higher than that of BOT I+II and benign groups whether in all, pre-, or postmenopausal groups (P<0.01).

When distinguishing BOT I+II from EOC I+II, the AUC-ROC of CPH-I and HE4 were bigger than CA125 (P<0.001), while the CPH-I has the highest sensitivities in all and postmenopausal groups (78.7%, 85.1%), and HE4 has the highest specificity and PPV (90.91%, 88.64%) in postmenopausal groups.

Under pathological stratification, HE4, ROMA, and CPH-I of the serous EOC I+II were higher than that of BOT I+II (P<0.001) and the AUC of the three indices were significantly bigger than CA125 (P<0.001).

However, the concentration of HE4 and CA125 and the values of CPH-I and ROMA have no significant difference between the two endometrioid subgroups.

The index with the highest sensitivity and NPV among the four indices of different pathological subtype groups was CPH-I, and the index with the highest specificities and PPV was HE4.

Conclusion.

CPH-I was more valuable than CA125 for differentiating BOT I+II from EOC I+II regardless of menopausal status, while HE4 might be better than CA125 for postmenopausal subgroups.

HE4 and CPH-I were more favorable than CA125 for differentiating BOT I+II from EOC I+II in the case of unknown pathology or in serous type.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Wang, Zhiheng& Tao, Xiang& Ying, Chunmei. 2019. CPH-I and HE4 Are More Favorable Than CA125 in Differentiating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at Early Stages. Disease Markers،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1147559

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Wang, Zhiheng…[et al.]. CPH-I and HE4 Are More Favorable Than CA125 in Differentiating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at Early Stages. Disease Markers No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1147559

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Wang, Zhiheng& Tao, Xiang& Ying, Chunmei. CPH-I and HE4 Are More Favorable Than CA125 in Differentiating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at Early Stages. Disease Markers. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1147559

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-1147559