A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy
المؤلفون المشاركون
Li, Xiaomao
Wang, Jia
Wu, Haotian
Zhang, Yu
Wang, Fei
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2020، العدد 2020 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2020)، ص ص. 1-10، 10ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2020-01-21
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
10
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Background.
The safety and effectiveness of robotic surgery are evaluated by comparing perioperative outcomes with laparoscopy and laparotomy in endometrial cancer.
Method.
PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and other databases were searched for eligible studies up to April 2019.
Studies that compared robotic surgery with laparoscopy or laparotomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer were included.
The pooled odds ratio and weighted mean difference were calculated using a random-effects or a fixed-effects model to summarize the results.
Results.
Twenty-seven articles were ultimately included, with one randomized controlled trial and 26 observational studies.
A total of 6568 patients were included.
Meta-analysis showed that robotic surgery had less estimated blood loss (P<0.001), blood transfusion (P=0.04), intraoperative complications (P=0.001), and conversion to open surgery (P=0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (P=0.001), but had a longer operation time (P=0.04) in surgical staging of endometrial cancer compared with laparoscopy.
There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, the total number of lymph nodes harvested, the number of pelvic lymph nodes harvested, and the number of para-aortic lymph nodes harvested between techniques.
Robotic surgery had a longer operation time (P=0.008), less estimated blood loss (P<0.001), blood transfusion (P<0.001), and postoperative complications (P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (P<0.001) compared with laparotomy.
There were no significant differences in other variables between techniques.
Conclusion.
Robotic surgery is a safer surgical approach than laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer, with less estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, and conversion, and the same number of lymph nodes harvested.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Wang, Jia& Li, Xiaomao& Wu, Haotian& Zhang, Yu& Wang, Fei. 2020. A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy. Disease Markers،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1153789
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Wang, Jia…[et al.]. A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy. Disease Markers No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1153789
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Wang, Jia& Li, Xiaomao& Wu, Haotian& Zhang, Yu& Wang, Fei. A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy. Disease Markers. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1153789
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1153789
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر