![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Comparison of Flow Solutions for Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Using Complex Analysis Methods (CAM) and Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM): Fundamental Design Differences and Improved Scaling Method
المؤلفون المشاركون
Khanal, Aaditya
Weijermars, Ruud
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2020، العدد 2020 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2020)، ص ص. 1-20، 20ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2020-10-13
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
20
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
The present study compares flow paths in reservoirs with natural fractures, solved with Complex Analysis Methods (CAM), to those solved with Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM).
One aim is to define scaling rules for the strength (flux) of the discrete natural fractures used in CAM models, which was previously theoretically defined based on the expected flow distortion.
A major hurdle for quantitative benchmarks of CAM with EDFM results is that each of the two methods accounts for natural fractures with different assumptions and input parameters.
For example, EDFM scales the permeability of the natural fractures based on a cubic equation, while CAM uses a flux strength.
The results from CAM and EDFM are used to scale the flux strength of the natural fractures and improve the equivalent permeability contrast estimation for CAM.
The permeability contrast for CAM is calculated from the ratio of the enhanced velocity inside natural fractures to the unperturbed matrix fluid velocity.
A significant advantage of flow and pressure models based on CAM is the high resolution without complex gridding.
Particle tracking results are presented for fractures with different hydraulic conductivity ranging from highly permeable to impervious.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Khanal, Aaditya& Weijermars, Ruud. 2020. Comparison of Flow Solutions for Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Using Complex Analysis Methods (CAM) and Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM): Fundamental Design Differences and Improved Scaling Method. Geofluids،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-20.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1165773
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Khanal, Aaditya& Weijermars, Ruud. Comparison of Flow Solutions for Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Using Complex Analysis Methods (CAM) and Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM): Fundamental Design Differences and Improved Scaling Method. Geofluids No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-20.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1165773
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Khanal, Aaditya& Weijermars, Ruud. Comparison of Flow Solutions for Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Using Complex Analysis Methods (CAM) and Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM): Fundamental Design Differences and Improved Scaling Method. Geofluids. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-20.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1165773
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1165773
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)