![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot
المؤلفون المشاركون
Wang, Chun
Chen, Dawei
Ran, Xingwu
Ma, Jing
Liu, Min
Liu, Guanjian
المصدر
International Journal of Endocrinology
العدد
المجلد 2017، العدد 2017 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2017)، ص ص. 1-6، 6ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2017-05-09
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
6
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Objective.
To evaluate the concordance between oscillometric ABI and standard Doppler ABI in diabetic Chinese patients with or without diabetic foot.
Methods.
230 consecutive diabetic patients (n=459 limbs) were included.
The right and left ABIs were determined with both devices by the same investigator.
The concordance and agreement were assessed by kappa index and the Bland-Altman method.
Results.
The average Doppler ABI was 1.003 ± 0.286 on the right and 0.990 ± 0.287 on the left, while oscillometric ABI was 1.002 ± 0.332 and 0.993 ± 0.319, which had no significance.
The average time for oscillometric ABI was 8.600 versus 16.980 minutes for Doppler ABI (p<0.001).
There was good agreement between the two measurements, with a kappa value of 0.869 on the right and 0.919 on the left.
Regarding the Doppler ABI as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and −LR of oscillometric ABI reached 95.22%, 94.34%, 95.48%, 20.873%, and 0.059% on the right.
For the left, it was 96.94%, 96.43%, 97.11%, 33.364%, and 0.036%.
Conclusions.
The oscillometric measurement is a reliable, convenient, and less time-consuming alternative to standard Doppler ABI in patients.
It should be widely used for PAD detection.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Ma, Jing& Liu, Min& Chen, Dawei& Wang, Chun& Liu, Guanjian& Ran, Xingwu. 2017. The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot. International Journal of Endocrinology،Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1166050
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Ma, Jing…[et al.]. The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot. International Journal of Endocrinology No. 2017 (2017), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1166050
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Ma, Jing& Liu, Min& Chen, Dawei& Wang, Chun& Liu, Guanjian& Ran, Xingwu. The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2017. Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1166050
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1166050
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)