The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot

المؤلفون المشاركون

Wang, Chun
Chen, Dawei
Ran, Xingwu
Ma, Jing
Liu, Min
Liu, Guanjian

المصدر

International Journal of Endocrinology

العدد

المجلد 2017، العدد 2017 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2017)، ص ص. 1-6، 6ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2017-05-09

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

6

التخصصات الرئيسية

الأحياء

الملخص EN

Objective.

To evaluate the concordance between oscillometric ABI and standard Doppler ABI in diabetic Chinese patients with or without diabetic foot.

Methods.

230 consecutive diabetic patients (n=459 limbs) were included.

The right and left ABIs were determined with both devices by the same investigator.

The concordance and agreement were assessed by kappa index and the Bland-Altman method.

Results.

The average Doppler ABI was 1.003 ± 0.286 on the right and 0.990 ± 0.287 on the left, while oscillometric ABI was 1.002 ± 0.332 and 0.993 ± 0.319, which had no significance.

The average time for oscillometric ABI was 8.600 versus 16.980 minutes for Doppler ABI (p<0.001).

There was good agreement between the two measurements, with a kappa value of 0.869 on the right and 0.919 on the left.

Regarding the Doppler ABI as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and −LR of oscillometric ABI reached 95.22%, 94.34%, 95.48%, 20.873%, and 0.059% on the right.

For the left, it was 96.94%, 96.43%, 97.11%, 33.364%, and 0.036%.

Conclusions.

The oscillometric measurement is a reliable, convenient, and less time-consuming alternative to standard Doppler ABI in patients.

It should be widely used for PAD detection.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Ma, Jing& Liu, Min& Chen, Dawei& Wang, Chun& Liu, Guanjian& Ran, Xingwu. 2017. The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot. International Journal of Endocrinology،Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1166050

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Ma, Jing…[et al.]. The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot. International Journal of Endocrinology No. 2017 (2017), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1166050

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Ma, Jing& Liu, Min& Chen, Dawei& Wang, Chun& Liu, Guanjian& Ran, Xingwu. The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2017. Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1166050

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-1166050