Augmentation versus No Augmentation for Immediate Postextraction Implants
المؤلفون المشاركون
Mohamed, Huda Hamed Basher
Serag Eldien, Asma M.
Zahran, Amr
المصدر
International Journal of Dentistry
العدد
المجلد 2018، العدد 2018 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2018)، ص ص. 1-10، 10ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2018-10-16
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
10
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Purpose.
To assess the effects of augmentation versus no augmentation in patients restored with immediate postextraction single-tooth implants on implant failure and patient satisfaction.
Materials and methods.
We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trial Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (22 March 2017).
Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data, and checked for accuracy.
We have expressed results as risk ratio or mean differences, together with their 95% confidence intervals.
Results.
We included six studies (287 participants).
Two trials compared no augmentation versus bone graft augmentation and reported no implant failures in both groups after a follow-up period of 6 months (20 implants) and 1 year (34 implants).
One trial compared bone graft augmentation versus membrane augmentation and reported no difference in implant failure between both groups after 6 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 15.31) or 1 year of follow-up (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.86), and no implants were lost after 3 years.
Three trials compared membrane augmentation versus combined bone graft and membrane augmentation, and there was no difference between the groups after six months of follow-up in implant failure (RR 5.13, 95% CI 0.63 to 41.93) or after 1 year (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.02 to 9.05).
There was insufficient evidence regarding patient satisfaction in all the included trials.
Conclusions.
In patients restored with immediate postextraction single-tooth implants, there is insufficient evidence to recommend simultaneous augmentation or a certain augmentation protocol to enhance implant survival and patient satisfaction.
This trial is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017054439).
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Mohamed, Huda Hamed Basher& Serag Eldien, Asma M.& Zahran, Amr. 2018. Augmentation versus No Augmentation for Immediate Postextraction Implants. International Journal of Dentistry،Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1170533
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Mohamed, Huda Hamed Basher…[et al.]. Augmentation versus No Augmentation for Immediate Postextraction Implants. International Journal of Dentistry No. 2018 (2018), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1170533
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Mohamed, Huda Hamed Basher& Serag Eldien, Asma M.& Zahran, Amr. Augmentation versus No Augmentation for Immediate Postextraction Implants. International Journal of Dentistry. 2018. Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1170533
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1170533
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر