The Comparison of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus Mini-Laparotomy Specimen Extraction for Colorectal Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes
المؤلفون المشاركون
He, Jun
Hu, Jun-Feng
Shao, Shu-Xian
Yao, Hai-Bo
Zhang, Xiu-Feng
Yang, Guan-Gen
Shen, Zhong
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2020، العدد 2020 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2020)، ص ص. 1-11، 11ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2020-01-31
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
11
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Aim.
The aims of this study were to compare the short-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLAPS) for colorectal tumours and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of NOSES in colorectal resection.
Methods.
A literature review was performed on the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases up to March 2019.
Papers conforming to the inclusion criteria were used for further analysis.
The short-term outcomes included intraoperative outcomes and postoperative recovery results.
The weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for continuous outcomes and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous results.
Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) or the 6-item Jadad scale.
Results.
Eight studies comprising 686 patients met the inclusion criteria.
Compared with CLAPS, NOSES had more advantages in terms of postoperative complications, postoperative pain, recovery of gastrointestinal function, duration of hospital stay, and cosmetic results.
The lymph nodes harvested and intraoperative blood loss in NOSES were comparable with CLAPS; however, a prolonged operative time was observed in NOSES.
Conclusions.
NOSES was shown to be a safe and viable alternative to CLAPS in colorectal oncology in terms of short-term results.
Further long-term and randomized trials are required.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
He, Jun& Hu, Jun-Feng& Shao, Shu-Xian& Yao, Hai-Bo& Zhang, Xiu-Feng& Yang, Guan-Gen…[et al.]. 2020. The Comparison of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus Mini-Laparotomy Specimen Extraction for Colorectal Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes. Journal of Oncology،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1189017
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
He, Jun…[et al.]. The Comparison of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus Mini-Laparotomy Specimen Extraction for Colorectal Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes. Journal of Oncology No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1189017
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
He, Jun& Hu, Jun-Feng& Shao, Shu-Xian& Yao, Hai-Bo& Zhang, Xiu-Feng& Yang, Guan-Gen…[et al.]. The Comparison of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus Mini-Laparotomy Specimen Extraction for Colorectal Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes. Journal of Oncology. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1189017
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1189017
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر