Comparison between the Effects of Acupuncture Relative to Other Controls on Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

المؤلفون المشاركون

Chen, Rixin
Zheng, Haizhen
Zhao, Xiaofeng
Li, Guanhui
Liang, Yi
Zhang, Hao
Chi, Zhenhai

المصدر

Pain Research and Management

العدد

المجلد 2019، العدد 2019 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2019)، ص ص. 1-13، 13ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2019-11-11

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

13

التخصصات الرئيسية

الأمراض

الملخص EN

Background.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder with recurrent abdominal pain and altered defecation habits.

We here attempted to determine the effect of acupuncture on IBS.

Methods.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of science, and ClinicalTrials.gov till July 17, 2019 were searched.

Outcomes were total efficacy rates, overall IBS symptom scores, or global quality of life scores.

Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI were calculated for meta-analysis.

Results.

We included 41 RCTs involving 3440 participants for analysis.

8 RCTs compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture, among which 3 trials confirmed the biological effects of acupuncture, especially in treating abdominal pain, discomfort, and stool frequency.

No significant difference was found when acupuncture was compared with sham acupuncture, in terms of effects on IBS symptoms and quality of life (SMD = 0.18, 95% CI −0.26∼0.63, P=0.42; SMD = −0.10, 95% CI −0.31∼0.11, P=0.35), but the pooled efficacy rate data showed a better outcome for true acupuncture (RR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.01∼1.47, P=0.04), which was not supported by sensitivity analysis.

Acupuncture was more effective relative to western medicine in alleviating IBS symptoms (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.12∼1.23, I2 = 0%, P<0.00001), whose effect might last 3 months.

Besides, acupuncture as an adjunct to western medicine, Chinese medications, or tuina was superior over the single latter treatment (RR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.40, P=0.004; 1.19, 1.03 to 1.36, P=0.02; 1.36, 1.08 to 1.72, P=0.009, respectively), with high heterogeneities.

Conclusions.

Relative to sham controls, acupuncture showed no superiority for treating IBS, while the advantage over western medicine was significant.

Acupuncture could be used as an adjunct in clinical settings to improve efficacy.

Future high-quality and large-sample-size studies with adequate quantity-effect design need to be conducted.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Zheng, Haizhen& Chen, Rixin& Zhao, Xiaofeng& Li, Guanhui& Liang, Yi& Zhang, Hao…[et al.]. 2019. Comparison between the Effects of Acupuncture Relative to Other Controls on Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Pain Research and Management،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-13.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1207242

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Zheng, Haizhen…[et al.]. Comparison between the Effects of Acupuncture Relative to Other Controls on Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Pain Research and Management No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-13.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1207242

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Zheng, Haizhen& Chen, Rixin& Zhao, Xiaofeng& Li, Guanhui& Liang, Yi& Zhang, Hao…[et al.]. Comparison between the Effects of Acupuncture Relative to Other Controls on Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Pain Research and Management. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-13.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1207242

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-1207242