أثر نموذجي بارمان و لاندافي تحصيل مادة قواعد اللغة العربية عند طلبة الصف الثاني المتوسط

الملخص EN

The present research aims at identifying the effect of the Parman and Landa models on the acquisition of Arabic grammar in second grade students.

To achieve the research objective, the researchers formulated the following zero hypotheses: 1.

There was no statistically significant difference at (0.05) among the averages of the students of the first experimental group who studied Arabic grammar using the Barman model and the average of the students of the second experimental group who studied the Arabic grammar using the non-test model in the post.

- 2.

There was no statistically significant difference at (0.05) among the average of the students of the first experimental group who studied the Arabic grammar using the Barman model and the average of the students of the control group who studied the same material in the traditional method (lecture) in the post-achievement test.

3.

There was no statistically significant difference at (0.05) among the average of the students of the second experimental group who studied the Arabic grammar using the Landa model and the average of the students of the control group whose students studied the same subject in the traditional method.

In order to achieve the goal of the research, the researchers chose Fatima Secondary School for Girls and Al Al-Bayt Secondary School for Girls and Quraysh Boys to represent the three research groups.

The total number of students in the first experimental group represented by Fatima Secondary School was 31 students, (32) students, which used the model Landa, and medium Quraish, which represents the control group studied in the traditional way and number (31) students, After applying the test, the researchers found that the students of the second experimental group, which studied the LANDA model, were superior to the students of the first group whose students studied using the Berman model and the students of the third control group who studied their students using the normal method.

The students of the first group were above the control group students in the post-achievement test.