الروايات المعلة بالاختلاف علي حماد بن زيد (ت 179هـ)‎ في كتاب علل الدارقطني (ت 385هـ)‎ : دراسة نقدية

الملخص EN

Defectiveness narrations of difference on Hammad bin Zaid (d.

179 e) in the book of the reasoning of Darqutni (d.

385 e) critical study

The reasoning science is one of the most accurate, and the greatest sciences of Hadith.

We can distinguish the true from the weak, so the scholars of Hadith gave special attention where they wrote books including a great book which is Aldarqotni (d.

385 e).

That book which collected the benefits, the incomparable things, partitives, and facts which shows the author's experience, and his mastery of Hadith Crafts; and as the science of difference on the scholars for the branches of defectiveness science; because it shows the mastered narrators and the most important of them about this Scholar, and this benefits when weighting between the narrations, shows the number of narrations in which the difference occurred from this Scholar and the reasons for the difference on this Scholar in these narrations.

All of the above needs to be accurate in research, patience, and thoughtfulness what strengthens the Hadith experience so I turned my face towards this book and chose the narrations of Hammad bin Zaid's defectiveness narration of difference from the narrators from him, with narrating them connected, and some narrators narrated them transmitted, as well as in traceable and discontinued Hadith in addition to adding a narrator in attribution of the occurrence of disturbance in the narration and so on.

So I prefer connection or transmission or tracing or discontinuity or added or decreased attribution.

God bless and help.