تدابير الطوارئ الصحية المتخذة لمواجهة جائحة كوفيد-19 ما بين اعتبارها حالة ضرورة لتعزيز و حماية الحق في الصحة، و انتهاك الحقوق و الحريات العامة : دراسة مقارنة

الملخص EN

The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic led to a major halt in public life and to a host of economic, social and political impacts, and some countries were working according to exceptional laws or enacting new emergency laws that caused a state of controversy, so a state of emergency was imposed, curfews, and cities and regions isolated Many media outlets stopped, transportation was restricted, and important sectors left the production circle, which had the biggest impact on public rights and freedoms.

However, these measures were necessary and required to curb the rapid spread of this virus, given that the state of emergency is a necessity imposed by the spread of the virus and its threat to the human group, and thus it is considered an exceptional system in which the various legal systems agree to guarantee the state's right to limit some rights and freedoms in order to preserve the security of people.

And their safety.

The study aimed to clarify the health emergency measures taken to confront the Covid-19 pandemic in various fields and activities, especially measures affecting public rights and freedoms, and the extent to which the spread of the Covid-19 virus is considered a necessity that requires taking exceptional measures by countries, and to indicate the extent to which the requirements of taking measures are reconciled.

Health emergencies to limit the spread of the virus and ensure protection of rights and freedoms as it is one of the duties of the state.

The study addressed the problem of research through review and analysis of the impact of health emergency measures on the essence of the inherent rights of the human person, and the need for reconciliation and proportionality between promoting the right to health and protecting public rights and freedoms.