مدى مشروعية تقييد حريات الأفراد خلال الأزمات الصحية : نموذج جائحة كورونا (Covid-19)‎ c

الملخص EN

The legality of restricting freedoms during health crises (Corona- virus model) The full enjoyment of the right to public health as a basic right and public freedoms, while it requires restricting some human rights within the framework of the principle of protecting public security and order The protection of these rights and freedoms is constitutionally linked to the rule of law Based on this, any talk about protecting or restricting human rights appears in its general context linked to the need for harmonization between national legislation and the scope of application of international human rights standards.

If the protection of public health as a component of the traditional public order permits the restriction of human rights, then it is in the current situation related to the health crisis associated with the Corona epidemic (covid-19) The precautionary measures it imposes to prevent this global epidemic can be considered a health condition that, by its nature or gravity, represents the nature of a public disaster, and perhaps this required the extension of the declaration of a state of emergency in the country besides taking precautionary measures and measures such as imposing curfews, closing borders and imposing some Based on this, the topic of our research on how a national policy in the field of human rights can guarantee the enjoyment of human rights and public freedoms in light of precautionary measures taken as a means to strengthen health systems in general in light of the "Corona- virus" pandemic based on the need for the state to respect international human rights conventions health measures such as quarantine.