إشكالية النقد المعرفي في الخطاب النقدي العربي الحديث

الملخص EN

The openness or transcendence between the humanities and its tendency at the present time to care for knowledge in all its forms represents an exceptional case produced by the great revolution of globalization that worked to represent a new dominant culture that transcended the geographical borders of different countries, cultures, and nationalities, which in turn led to the subject of culture and related to the negative and positive sides.

It is a major topic in most human sciences, and on this basis of the frequent relations between the cultures of peoples, new concepts and terms such as margin, center, femininity, masculinity, colonial discourse and beyond, and an intellectual, authority, and cultural criticism in all its forms, starting from the moment when the modern critical discourse approaches the creative text in terms of discovery of contours, contexts that are contrived or distorted and included, and the role of the language or creative text in not transforming itself into a social, cultural, or political document, not only modern critical approaches have started in the direction of awareness, perceptions and investment in the creative text, shifting the topic of the creative text from the aesthetic and cultural subject to the subject matter.

The impact of humanities that have been associated with knowledge such as cognitive sociology, cognitive psychology, the concept of metaphor, cognitive linguistics, programs of neurological studies, biological theory, and artificial intelligence plays an important role in representing a reference or successor benefiting from cognitive criticism, and perhaps these various references have influenced the identification of the term, concept, and procedural critical practice in terms of turmoil, and shadowiness of the term, as well as the diversity of cognitive critical visions of the text that lean on different paths, including the path of cognitive or cognitive linguistics, and the other path on philosophy The concepts and perceptions presented by George Lykov, Mark Johnson and other philosophers who inaugurated an important stage in the formation, production and circulation of this term in the Western incubator, and perhaps these problems in terms of term, concept and procedure have had a direct impact on modern Arabic critical discourse which caused a state of confusion and problem In terms of naturalization, selection and The openness or transcendence between the humanities and its tendency at the present time to care for knowledge in all its forms represents an exceptional case produced by the great revolution of globalization that worked to represent a new dominant culture that transcended the geographical borders of different countries, cultures, and nationalities, which in turn led to the subject of culture and related to the negative and positive sides.

It is a major topic in most human sciences, and on this basis of the frequent relations between the cultures of peoples, new concepts and terms such as margin, center, femininity, masculinity, colonial discourse and beyond, and an intellectual, authority, and cultural criticism in all its forms, starting from the moment when the modern critical discourse approaches the creative text in terms of discovery of contours, contexts that are contrived or distorted and included, and the role of the language or creative text in not transforming itself into a social, cultural, or political document, not only modern critical approaches have started in the direction of awareness, perceptions and investment in the creative text, shifting the topic of the creative text from the aesthetic and cultural subject to the subject matter.

The impact of humanities that have been associated with knowledge such as cognitive sociology, cognitive psychology, the concept of metaphor, cognitive linguistics, programs of neurological studies, biological theory, and artificial intelligence plays an important role in representing a reference or successor benefiting from cognitive criticism, and perhaps these various references have influenced the identification of the term, concept, and procedural critical practice in terms of turmoil, and shadowiness of the term, as well as the diversity of cognitive critical visions of the text that lean on different paths, including the path of cognitive or cognitive linguistics, and the other path on philosophy The concepts and perceptions presented by George Lykov, Mark Johnson and other philosophers who inaugurated an important stage in the formation, production and circulation of this term in the Western incubator, and perhaps these problems in terms of term, concept and procedure have had a direct impact on modern Arabic critical discourse which caused a state of confusion and problem In terms of naturalization, selection and legalization.