أحاديث صحيح البخاري التي اتفق الأئمة الأربعة على ترك العمل بظاهرها : دراسة استقرائية تحليلية

الملخص EN

This research revolves around the narrations that are connected to the prophet (PBUH) in Sahih Al Bukhari whose apparent denotations the four Imams agreed to leave out, as expressed in the favored opinion of their Jurisprudence School (Mu’tamad Al Mathhab).

In this study, the researcher conducted an inductive study on Sahih Al Bukhari and found twelve narrations that match the criteria of the research.

The importance of this discussion lies in defending Sahih Al Bukhari, which is the most authentic book after the book of Allah.

This research responds to and eliminates the arguments of intruders, ignorant and fake knowledge claimants who are trying to break the unbreakable by questioning and casting doubt on the text of some of the prophet’s (PBUH) narrations.

The study concluded that there is no connected Hadith in Sahih Al Bukhari that was eliminated in terms of its apparent meaning by all the scholars, even if it was an Abrogated Narration.

It also came to the conclusion that the narrations whose apparent denotations the four Imams agreed to neglect are mostly abrogated by other explicit narrations, or they do not explicitly indicate the neglected ruling in their apparent denotations.