زواج التجربة : صوره و أحكامه : دراسة فقهية تحليلية مقارنة

الملخص EN

The trial marriage research presented the definition of the trial marriage, and when it appeared, then divided the problems of the trial marriage into two topics, the first of them with regard to the requirement of anaphylaxis, and the second with regard to the condition that divorce does not occur; So he began with the requirement of piety in the contract, and that it is forbidden and invalid by consensus, whether they pronounce it or write it, then he went to another form, which is if the contracting party had the intention of pious, and that the majority of jurists are on his health - even if they hate it - and that among the Hanbali jurists who saw its invalidity, then the research went around To a ruling if the person against whom the contract was made contains this intention or her guardian, and that it is of two opinions according to the Hanbalis, then the research showed that the rulings for taking back are lighter than the rulings Marriage, if he takes his wife back, and the take-back is established, then the take-back is valid, as he clarified that there is nothing wrong with being pious in reconciling between spouses; It is not a new contract.

Then the research began with regard to the condition that the divorce should not be effected - even if the husband signed it - and it was clear that it is invalid, and that the scholars objected to those who took this path; As if he issued a fatwa in Syriac, then concluded the research by transferring the fatwa of the Egyptian Dar al-Ifta, and some famous muftis denying trial marriage.