منازعات التنفيذ في قرارات قاضي التنفيذ القضائية في ضوء قانون الإجراءات المدنية الإماراتي

الملخص EN

The study examines the decisions of the judicial execution judge, the temporary and substantive problems that revolve around them, and the adequacy of the legislative texts in separating the problems, as the legislator organized the procedures of temporary disputes with texts of their own, and referred the substantive implementation disputes to the general provisions.

It also specified the conditions that must be followed in consideration of problems and not to waste time.

And he specified two types of procedures for raising the problem in temporary disputes, by the ordinary way, according to the normal procedures for registering the case in the court, and the second type in the commencement of the execution dispute before the execution agent.

The researcher discussed the Emirati legislator’s approach to explicitly excluding some disputes from the jurisdiction of the enforcement judge, the conditions that must be met in substantive cases, and the procedures for raising a substantive dispute.

The researcher used both descriptive and analytical approaches to clarify and explain the Federal Civil Procedure Law, and the study concluded with findings and recommendations, and the researcher recommended the necessity of developing legislation related to procedures for raising substantive disputes.