الطعن بالنقض في أحكام الطلاق بين ثوابت قانون الأسرة والجواز القانوني

الملخص EN

This study aims to criticize the text of Article 452 CAPL )Civil and administrative procedures law ( which allows for a veto of divorce rulings issued by courts and judicial councils.

The unquestioned fact is that the divorce provisions issued by the family judge are clear divorce provisions that end the marital relationship, whether on the grounds of divorce by individual will, divorce, divorce or divorce or by mutual consent.

The government's policy of "taking into account the rights of the child" is a matter of concern to the government.

A wife whose relationship has ended, whether by the judge or by the end of her marriage or together, is entitled to marry legally and legally, as long as the appeal does not stop the execution of the sentence.

Therefore, if a challenge against the rest of the articles is permissible, it is not permissible in divorce provisions because of the different material source of the provisions of divorce - Islamic law - while the material source of the rest of the articles is positive law, and the kit is a constant of the principles of family law, as are the provisions of divorce.