التعايش مع الآخر في معالجة الخطاب الإعلامي لأزمة الرسوم الكاريكاتيرية المسيئة للرسول صلى الله عليه و سلم : دراسة تحليلية نقدية مقارنة بين الخطاب الإعلامي للرئيس الفرنسي و شيخ الأزهر

الملخص EN

The study aims to elicit principles and foundations of media speech that are applicable to peaceful coexistence with the other, through a qualitative analysis of the two media speech of the study sample.

The study relied on the three methodological approaches: socio-cognitive discourse analysis (Van Dyck), critical discourse analysis (Norman Fairclough), and argumentative analysis (dialectical argument theory) the study concluded that what these curricula and theories assumed of bias and racism in media discourses issued by people with different ideological and intellectual orientations do not apply to the media discourse of the Sheikh of Al-Azhar, but clearly applied to the speech of the French president who showed himself Positive and the other absolutely negative.

The language of the speech was subjective.

The offense was not only attributed to its perpetrators, but it expanded in highlighting the hatred of Islam and all Muslims, accusing them of terrorism, violence, hatred of the other, stupidity and madness, and that they would like to assassinate the future of France, while insisting not to abandon the insulting cartoons.

And its continuation, despite his certainty that it hurts the feelings of Muslims.

As for the speech of the Sheikh of Al-Azhar, it was characterized by a plurality of methods, with moderate, moderate thought, persuasion and mental persuasion strategies, the diversity of martyrdom, making comparisons, clarifying conclusions and developing rational solutions to get out of the crisis, while the use of emotional solicitation was few compared to the mentality and the intimidation strategies and solicitations completely disappeared.