الرواة الذين وصفهم أبو حاتم بالصدق و ترك الاحتجاج بهم : دراسة تطبيقية تحليلية نقدية

الملخص EN

This study examines the quoted speech of an early credit and discredit scholar describing a hadith narrator as this, “his narration of hadiths is true and recordable, but not reliable”, to identify the essence and the narrators who were described by this statement.

I handled this issue using two major parts, the first one is to study a theory in which I explained the intended meaning of Abu Hatem’s phrase “but not reliable”, this phrase pointed out to faulty and imbalanced hadiths.

In another chapter, I tackled the comments of scholars on the above statement “his narration of hadiths is true and recordable, but not reliable”, from which we could compare certain comments with the said statement and choose the preponderant one.

In the second part, I shed light on an applied study involved 22 narrators, who were described by Abu Hatem with the same statement “is narration of hadiths is true and recordable, but not reliable”, along with the reported opinion of Abu Hatem and other Imams on each narrator, followed by my own comment, either by agreement or disagreement with Abu Hatem, I agreed on 10 and disagreed on 11, such disagreement relied on the comparison I made with other Imams and out of the severe judgement on such narrators.

Finally, I concluded a variety of results, of which the most significant was the severe judgment of Abu Hatem on hadith narrators, and the necessity for inspecting the opinions of the other scholars on the same issue to identify the preponderant ones.