الخلاف النحوي في استعمال الجملة الإنشائية في التراكيب العربية : عرضا و مناقشة

الملخص EN

This research deals with the structural sentence in terms of its rotation in grammatical use, used and unused, and reveals the structures that grammarians differed in regarding the permissibility of using the structural sentence with it and not using it, and it presents the dispute that took place between the grammarians in that, and highlights the arguments of the impediments, and the evidence of the authorizers, adhering to the weighting between He pointed out that the structural sentence may need something before it; Because it clarifies it, completes its meaning, helps in completing the sentence, and clarifies the intent, and what precedes it may not need it; Because it - in the view of many grammarians - does not clarify it, and does not benefit the whole sentence, such as their indication - for example - that the relative connection does not connect the command and the prohibition; Because they do not clarify the relative and do not make it clear, as well as the advocacy sentence, as it is in the status of an order, so it is not said: the one who is hit or not hit by Zaid, unlike the declarative sentence that is suitable in this place, and the prohibition of that status as well.

As their indication that the imperative sentence does not fall into news for the beginner as it is an order, and that what appears from what appears to be the occurrence of the construction sentence is news, so the interpretation of the saying.

.

.

and so on.

The research also cautioned on the necessity of congruence between the sentences, which achieves one indication, and pointed to the observance of the logic of harmony between the elements of the sentence, which must be present strongly when making the phrase, and at the time of sending it to the recipient.

.