الفروق الجوهرية بين التخابر مع دولة أجنبية و التبليغ بانتهاك حقوق الأنسان

الملخص EN

The research paper dealt with the essential differences between communicating with a foreign country and reporting a violation of human rights.

The aim of this research paper is to reduce the phenomenon of communicating by increasing the legal awareness of the public in general, and to help achieve the correct application of the law in order to preserve human rights, and to overcome difficulties Obstacles to those in charge of implementing the law.

The importance of this paper lies in the fact that the process of seeking and intelligence in all its various forms - which are state security crimes or crimes against the state’s external security - are a means used by states to secure their interests in various fields through individuals.

The crime of espionage in Sudanese legislation and its compatibility with comparative legislation.

The paper followed the descriptive analytical approach.

The paper reached several conclusions, including that the crime of communicating is one of the crimes that can be committed in one of the forms of an unintended mistake, if the mistake results in facilitating the occurrence of a crime of communicating.

The paper recommended several recommendations, including that the general criminal intent to commit espionage crimes; Because saying that a special criminal intent is required in the crimes of communication, means that when that intent is absent, it leads to the absence of the character of communication from it, and then it turns into an ordinary crime