المراد بالنص في قاعدة "لا اجتهاد مع النص"

الملخص EN

This research dealt with the rule (no diligence –ijtihad- with the text) in general, so it clarified its meaning, formulas, evidence and importance in controlling diligence, and its role in determining what is permissible and what is not permissible.

He clarified its meaning in language, and presented its releases and idiomatic uses in heritage books in general Then he presented its concept according to the Hanafi fundamentalists and the fundamentalists of the theologians, and among the jurists, as it specified what is meant by the categorical text in the rule according to the heritage reality.

With definitive proof and evidence, but it is applied to the speech of the two revelations, whether it is definitive in terms of evidence or apparent, or probable and outweighed by considered evidence, For them, it is in contrast to analogy, consensus, deduction, and the generality of reasonable evidence, so the rule was meant that (there is no diligence –ijtihad- in contrast to the correct text with all its strong apparent meanings), and not (there is no diligence –ijtihad- in contrast to the text that is definitive proof and evidence only as it is delusional).