الفكر الإصلاحي للأستاذ جمال الدين الأفغاني و الشيخ محمد عبده في ميزان الدعوة الإسلامية

الملخص EN

The reformist thought of Professor Jamal al-Din al-Afghani and Sheikh Muhammad Abdo in the balance of Islam] was represented in: The thought of Professor Jamal al-Din al-Afghani and Sheikh Muhammad Abdo represented a clear weight in the religious and societal reform work that is not denied by a researcher who agreed with them or disagreed with them.

Also, their thought was similar in its origin to the degree of formal congruence, which means that it is not a telepathy of thoughts, but rather deliberate steps, a scientific and practical partnership that lasted for years, and opinions that grew out of thinking and contemplation.

One of the most important reasons that prompted me to choose this topic was to take advantage of the research opportunity to get acquainted closely with the intellectual heritage of two of the most important influencers in Islamic public opinion in the twentieth century AD, and to try to benefit from the positive aspects of a reform experience that was always admired by many.

My methodology in the research - after scientific honesty and the use of methods that match the nature of the research - was represented in: relying on what the two men wrote, as well as what was written about the two men in praise or criticism, so that the ideas of analysis and evaluation factors fused in my mind out of conviction and moderation, not out of prejudice or prejudice.

Then I reached a number of results, including: that the main reason for some of the criticisms that were taken against the two men was that they threw a stone in stagnant water, and that was with reformist sayings and actions that were not issued by anyone, so they were new that called for astonishment and then criticism, and criticism was what Adel Najm It is about seeing and analyzing, and some of it is what is unfair, its wisdom is affiliations and prejudices, and it resulted from indoctrination.