حجية الحكم الجنائي في دعوى الحق الخاص : دراسة مقارنة بين قانون الإجراءات الجنائية السوداني لسنة 1991 م و نظام الإجراءات الجزائية السعودي لسنة 1435 ه

الملخص EN

Authoritative Criminal Judgment in a Private Right Law case: A comparative study between Sudanese Criminal procedure Law 1991 A D and Saudi Punitive Procedure System1435 A H.

This research entitled (Authoritative Criminal Judgment in a Private Right Law case: A comparative Study between Sudanese Criminal procedure Law 1991 A D and Saudi Punitive Procedure System 1435 A H) aims to discuss the problem of the authenticity of the criminal judgment before civil courts when looking at a sub-civil case that had previously been considered before criminal courts.

And the concept of the private right lawsuit, the conditions for the private right lawsuit in the criminal case, and the effect of the authenticity of the criminal judgment in the conviction on the private right lawsuit.

These elements were formulated in the form of the current study objectives and came out with the following results: 1- If the criminal and civil lawsuits were filed at the same time, it is necessary to waive for a civil case as a precondition, for the continuity of compensation procedures before the Criminal Court.

2- The private lawsuit shall be considered before the criminal court, as it is a case subordinate to the criminal case.

3- It is permissible to proceed with the compensation lawsuit brought before the criminal courts independently of the civil lawsuit in Sudanese law.

4- The judicial competence in hearing a civil case requires the occurrence of a full-fledged crime in principle.

5-The Saudi Law of Criminal Procedure for the year 1435H went to the same course as the Sudanese Criminal Procedures Law of 1991 A D.