المقارنة بين طرائق التدريس وفق مستوى مهارة القراءة الصامتة لطلبة معهد الفنون الجميلة

الملخص EN

The aim of the current research is to compare two teaching methods, namely, the guided exploration method and the standard method after determining it through analyzing the exploratory study and adopting the effect size as a test or the dividing line between the two methods based on descriptive statistical indicators.

The limits of the research and the research sample consisted of 20 teachers and schools equally distributed according to the gender variable to apply the test to the sample of learners and the size of 100 male and female students in the third grade average distributed according to the teaching method and according to gender equally and after verifying the psychometric characteristics to test the silent reading skills of coincidence and stability and applying it to a sample The students and corrected them according to the correction keys.

The quantitative data were entered into the SPSS statistical program and the following results were concluded: 1- The group of guided exploration method with mean (288, 29) and standard deviation (43, 2) outperformed the standard method with mean (577, 21) and standard deviation (87, 3) 2- Females outperformed the test as a whole with an arithmetic mean (453 and 23) over males in silent reading with an arithmetic mean (565, 22) and a standard deviation (890, 2) 3- There is a significant difference between the averages of the two accounts according to the teaching method and in favor of the directed exploration method.

The calculated T value reached 2 and 387, which is more than the tabular value at the significance level of 0, 05 and under the running score of 98, which is (98 and 1), so the second null hypothesis was rejected 4- There is no significant difference attributable to the gender variable, as the calculated T value reached 0,203, which is less than the tabular value 1,98, so the first null hypothesis is accepted 5- The size of the effect according to the coefficient (d, Cohen) amounted to 88 and 1, which is the largest and in favor of the guided exploration method 6- By comparison, we find that the guided exploration method is more effective than the standard method The researcher concluded some conclusions, including the lack of interest of Arabic language teachers in adopting silent reading in their daily or annual study plans, and recommended some recommendations with the suggestion of some complementary or developmental studies.