حق تقرير المصير من منظور الشرعية الدولية

الملخص EN

This paper deals with the historical and social context of the right to selfdetermination and the extent of its legitimacy in accordance with the standards of principles and rules of international law in light of the developments that have taken place in this right since its inception (its roots and birth), while the rules and principles of international law have been explicitly and beyond any doubt that peoples have the right to self-determination.

To be free from colonialism, foreign domination and exploitation so that it can freely choose its destiny.

The independent countries must also provide the necessary support to the peoples to combat colonialism and refrain from every measure that prevents them from achieving their independence.

As for the peoples, they have the right to struggle in accordance with the provisions of the law and the relevant Sharia decisions, and they may regain that right by any of the means available to them, provided they comply.

What is stated in the rules and principles of international law, which represents one of the exceptions to the principle of non-recourse to force in international relations, as it is one of the basic and binding rights agreed upon by the joints of the modern world, especially since there are several standards that have come to light through charters, treaties and protocols Accompanying the development of international law, most of them are consistent and consistent with the right to self-determination, which is one of the peremptory and binding rules that may not be violated or agreed upon.

Many resolutions passed by the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations.