الفقه التكاملي وتطبيقاته المعاصرة في الأزمات

الملخص EN

The sobriety of rulings and Fatwas related to contemporary calamities and emergency crises is closer to the intent of the legislator (almighty Allah) and the purposes of legislation when it is relied on a renewed jurisprudence (Fiqh) based on complementarity, by knowing the practical Islamic legal rulings deduced by combining the evidence of two or more sciences related to one related subject.

This study aims to clarify the Islamic legal criteria on which the integrative Islamic jurisprudence is based, and its impact on the Islamic jurisprudential treatment of developments, and comparison when scramble judgments, especially in coming down epidemics.

By adopting the inductive approach, we concluded that the duties of Sharia fall with the general harm, complete Inability, severe embarrassment, or unusual hardship, because the necessity of self-preservation takes precedence over the needs of preserving religion, and the spread of the epidemic is a legitimate excuse for taking the license to perform collective worship, such as the fall of the obligation of the Friday prayer, and the abandonment of attending the congregational prayer in the mosque, and determining the reality or the expected in building the perceptions of these issues is due to the people of experience, competence and ability, and in the Corona epidemic, they are: (the Islamic jurists, medical and health scientists, and the competent authorities).

As that confronting the calamities of epidemics requires collective effort, and promoting integrative scientific communication with other related disciplines, to achieve integrative Islamic jurisprudence.