أسس النقد التفسيري عند السايس في كتابه تفسير آيات الأحكام: عرض ودراسة

الملخص EN

This research came to highlight the grounds for the explanatory criticism of Says by which Says was found to have been interpreted and critical, especially in his interpretation of the verdicts.

Not only was it conveyed and interpreted, and I used the critical approach to reach out, despite the fact that the book is a brief explanation.

The journals of explanatory criticism at Sace have varied not only in the field of jurisprudence but also in the field of jurisprudence, doctrine, literature and language.

It turns out that the critique of sais was briefly far from excessive and excessive.

Sais adopted the Koran and Sunnah as the main foundations of interpretive criticism and then adopted unanimity and reason as the foundations of his interpretive critique.

And sais used different critical terms, some of them indicating weakness, like (this is a weak saying, and that's not true, this is a saying without evidence...) The other indicates weighting such as (correctest, desirable, correctest....) .