Post-dialysis solutes rebound : comparison of two protocols for Hemodialysis
المؤلف
المصدر
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
العدد
المجلد 9، العدد 2 (30 إبريل/نيسان 1998)، ص ص. 139-143، 5ص.
الناشر
تاريخ النشر
1998-04-30
دولة النشر
السعودية
عدد الصفحات
5
التخصصات الرئيسية
الموضوعات
الملخص EN
The blood urea concentration is artificially low immediately following highefficiency dialysis.
Post-dialysis urea rebound correlates with hemodialysis efficiency, and is inversely correlated with dialysis treatment time.
We evaluated the effect of variation in the length of hemodialysis treatment on urea, creatinine and other solutes rebound.
We used two protocols for hemodialysis, using 500-ml dialysate/min and similar dialyzed blood volume.
Protocol A: hemodialysis with blood flow of 300 ml/min for four hours; protocol B: hemodialysis with blood flow of 400 ml/min for three hours.
Fifteen stable anuric patients with end- stage renal disease (ESRD) were hemodialysed using each protocol, three sessions a week, for a period of two weeks.
The mean dialyzed blood volume in protocol A and B was 66 ± 4 and 67 ± 4.8 liters/session, respectively.
The mean blood flow in protocol A was 286 ± 22 ml/min, and in protocol B was 395.3 ± 13 ml/min.
The mean urea pre and immediately post dialysis in patient using protocol A was 20.5 ± 5.4 and 5.55 ± 2.2 mmol/L, respectively.
While in protocol B it was 19.8 ± 4.6 and 6 ± 1.68 mmol/L.
The mean urea, one hour post dialysis, in protocol A was 6.51 ± 1.9 Vs 8.04 ± 2.6 mmol/L in protocol B (P value < 0.003).
The percent rebound of mean blood urea concentration in protocol A and B one hour post dialysis was 17.3% vs 34%, respectively.
Predialysis creatinine in protocol A and B was 894 ± 156.8 vs 907.9 ± 163 umol/L, respectively (P= 0.4).
The immediately post-dialysis creatinine in protocol A and B, was 317± 98.4 vs 331 ± 72.0 µmol/L (P = 0.4), while one hour later it was 398.6 ± 104.0 vs 442.6 ± 107.2 µmol/L, respectively (P value < 0.007).
The percent rebound of creatinine was 25.6% in protocol A vs 33.5% in protocol B.
These results show significant difference between the two protocols, and confirm increased rebound of urea and creatinine one hour post dialysis with shorter time of dialysis treatment.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
al-Wakil, Jamal S.. 1998. Post-dialysis solutes rebound : comparison of two protocols for Hemodialysis. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation،Vol. 9, no. 2, pp.139-143.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-163440
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
al-Wakil, Jamal S.. Post-dialysis solutes rebound : comparison of two protocols for Hemodialysis. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation Vol. 9, no.2 (December 1998), pp.139-143.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-163440
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
al-Wakil, Jamal S.. Post-dialysis solutes rebound : comparison of two protocols for Hemodialysis. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation. 1998. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp.139-143.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-163440
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 143
رقم السجل
BIM-163440
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر