أحكام الطعن في حكم التحكيم وفقا للقانون السوداني و المقارن

الملخص EN

Considering that the target of any dispute before tribunals is to be terminated via a judgment issued by an authorized court or tribunal, judgment is the final stage of arbitration process, therefore the ordinary way for the arbitration process should end into a decision concerning the topic of the dispute.

Appeal and Revision are important stages post the judicial decision issuance, because these procedures participate in the settlement and the confidence of the judgment, so appeal is a right of each dispute part, so the question is: are the same procedures followed in the arbitration system? Therefore this study tried to explore the rules regulating the appeal procedures in the arbitration judgment, whether it is national or foreign arbitration, also it tried to explore the ability of the Sudanese Arbitration Act 2005 to include all the improvements in the procedures followed regarding the international commercial arbitration with respect to the appeal of the arbitration judgment, and compared its versions with the versions included in the other national legislations and arbitration institutions in order to recognize the reality of the situation in Sudan.

In doing so.

the researcher has adopted the descriptive comparative approach, and has divided this study into three chapters.