Traditional audit versus business risk audit : a comparative study case of Jordan

العناوين الأخرى

التدقيق التقليدي و التدقيق المستند الى المخاطر : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة على قطاع التدقيق في الأردن

مقدم أطروحة جامعية

al-Araj, Rim Shahir Muhammad

مشرف أطروحة جامعية

Abd Allah, Khalid Amin

أعضاء اللجنة

al-Sarraf, Zaki Jawad
Khaddash, Husam al-Din
Husayn, Nizam Muhammad Ali

الجامعة

الأكاديمية العربية للعلوم المالية و المصرفية

الكلية

كلية العلوم المالية و المصرفية

القسم الأكاديمي

قسم المحاسبة

دولة الجامعة

الأردن

الدرجة العلمية

دكتوراه

تاريخ الدرجة العلمية

2010

الملخص الإنجليزي

This dissertation aimed to survey the audit approaches currently used by auditors in Jordan, define their weaknesses, and identify the benefits accruing from the adoption of the Business Risk Audit Approach, the challenges that face this adoption along with steps, procedures and prerequisites of adoption..

To realize the above objectives, a questionnaire was designed and distributed to 270 practicing auditors out of which 137 responses were subjected to analysis after excluding the illegible ones.

In addition some data was collected from secondary sources including books, periodicals, and unpublished dissertations.

Statistical analysis tools included descriptive statistical analysis; means and standard deviations, one sample T-Test, Cronbach Alpha, one-way ANOVA, and (K-S) Test.

The researcher came up with many conclusions most important of which were: the Traditional Audit Approaches are commonly used in Jordan despite their suffering from certain weaknesses; the Business Risk Audit Approach is still not well known or practiced in Jordan despite its enjoyment of many benefits; and the Business Risk Audit Approach faces many challenges yet these could be overcome by some recommended steps and measures specified in the recommendations.

التخصصات الرئيسية

العلوم المالية و المحاسبية

الموضوعات

عدد الصفحات

134

قائمة المحتويات

Table of contents.

Abstract.

Chapter One : general framework.

Chapter Two : theoretical background.

Chapter Three : literature review.

Chapter Four : research methodology.

Chapter Five : data analysis and hypotheses testing.

Chapter Six : conclusions and recommendations.

References.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

al-Araj, Rim Shahir Muhammad. (2010). Traditional audit versus business risk audit : a comparative study case of Jordan. (Doctoral dissertations Theses and Dissertations Master). Arab Academy for Financial and Banking Sciences, Jordan
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-307538

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

al-Araj, Rim Shahir Muhammad. Traditional audit versus business risk audit : a comparative study case of Jordan. (Doctoral dissertations Theses and Dissertations Master). Arab Academy for Financial and Banking Sciences. (2010).
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-307538

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

al-Araj, Rim Shahir Muhammad. (2010). Traditional audit versus business risk audit : a comparative study case of Jordan. (Doctoral dissertations Theses and Dissertations Master). Arab Academy for Financial and Banking Sciences, Jordan
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-307538

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

نوع البيانات

رسائل جامعية

رقم السجل

BIM-307538