كفاءة التصنيف البلاغي : مصطلحات علم البيان نموذجا

الملخص EN

This study tackles the issue of the controversial nature of the artistic literary phenomenon and the terms of rhetoric coined to accommodate its various forms.

Rhetoricians have striven to ensure that their terms are coined as per the strictest criteria so that they can be all inclusive and conclusive and straight to the point.

In their effort to achieve this, they have clearly defined criteria to differentiate between similar phenomena, in a bid to eliminate overlapping and confusion.

However, applied practice in the writings of rhetoricians reveals mutiny of the artistic phenomenon against the mould of the term wherein it is forced.

Thus, it becomes classifiable under more than one type of rhetoric.

This is where the baseline knowledge, whereupon the inclusive-conclusive approach, is based appears deficient.

The study of this controversy in the field of variable arts of eloquence-subject of this research study- will set the stage for reconsidering a number of terms that can be replaced by other terms which are better expressive of those phenomena.

It will also lead to a reduction in the space allocated for terms of eloquence which spread over an area unreflective of their actual uses.

The opposite is perhaps possible, which may prompt new coinages to those terms that may be more flexible in accommodating the artistic phenomena and their duplicate nature.