Extra-amniotic saline versus extraamniotic misoprostol for ripening the unfavorable cervix
المؤلف
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 17، العدد 1 (31 مارس/آذار 2011)، ص ص. 72-77، 6ص.
الناشر
تاريخ النشر
2011-03-31
دولة النشر
العراق
عدد الصفحات
6
التخصصات الرئيسية
الموضوعات
الملخص EN
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two methods (extra-amniotic saline instillation and extra-amniotic misoprostol) for ripening the unfavorable cervix.
The study was set at the labour room in Basrah Maternity (teaching) hospital with 300 bed capacity.
It is a prospective comparative study conducted to compare extra-amniotic saline instillation and extra-amniotic Misoprostol for ripening the unfavorable cervix.
Group I (Extra-amniotic saline instillation): Foley’s catheter with extra-amniotic normal saline instillation at a rate of 1ml/min.
Group II (extra-amniotic Misoprostol): The cervix was ripped with 25mcg.
Misoprostol injected extra-amniotically using a Foley’s catheter.
The clinical trial involved a total (121) pregnant women, in group I (57) and in group II (64).
The success rates in achieving cervical ripening were 100% for both groups.
The mean post ripening Bishop’s score in group II (primigravidae (7.5 ± 1.5), multigravidae (7.86 ± 1.39)) were significantly higher than those in group I (primigravidae (6.01±0.4), multigravidae (6.07± 0.47)).
The mean ripening time (hrs) in group II (primigravidae (6.15± 2.1), multigravidae (4.03± 1.3)) were significantly shorter than those in group I (primigravidae (7.71± 1.02), multigravidae (6.4± 1.02)).
The mean induction-delivery time (hrs) in group II (primigravidae (5.3± 2), multigravidae (3.8± 1.4)) were significantly shorter than those in group I (primigravidae (7,7± 2.03), multigravidae (5.92± 1.9)).
The vast majority of women under study had vaginal delivery (80.7% in group I and 96.8% in group II).
In conclusion, EAM was quick and effective method for ripening the cervix, it requires little training for application so that it is a suitable method for patients who require rapid induction of labour.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
al-Asadi, Ali F.. 2011. Extra-amniotic saline versus extraamniotic misoprostol for ripening the unfavorable cervix. Basrah Journal of Surgery،Vol. 17, no. 1, pp.72-77.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-387439
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
al-Asadi, Ali F.. Extra-amniotic saline versus extraamniotic misoprostol for ripening the unfavorable cervix. Basrah Journal of Surgery Vol. 17, no. 1 (Mar. 2011), pp.72-77.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-387439
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
al-Asadi, Ali F.. Extra-amniotic saline versus extraamniotic misoprostol for ripening the unfavorable cervix. Basrah Journal of Surgery. 2011. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp.72-77.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-387439
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 77
رقم السجل
BIM-387439
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر