Comparison of Raw Dairy Manure Slurry and Anaerobically Digested Slurry as N Sources for Grass Forage Production

المؤلفون المشاركون

Bary, Andy I.
Whitefield, Elizabeth
Kennedy, Ann C.
Cogger, Craig G.
Fortuna, Ann-Marie
Harrison, Joe H.
Saunders, Olivia E.

المصدر

International Journal of Agronomy

العدد

المجلد 2012، العدد 2012 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2012)، ص ص. 1-10، 10ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2012-05-06

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

10

التخصصات الرئيسية

الزراعة

الملخص EN

We conducted a 3-year field study to determine how raw dairy slurry and anaerobically digested slurry (dairy slurry and food waste) applied via broadcast and subsurface deposition to reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) affected forage biomass, N uptake, apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR), and soil nitrate concentrations relative to urea.

Annual N applications ranged from 600 kg N ha−1 in 2009 to 300 kg N ha−1 in 2011.

Forage yield and N uptake were similar across slurry treatments.

Soil nitrate concentrations were greatest at the beginning of the fall leaching season, and did not differ among slurry treatments or application methods.

Urea-fertilized plots had the highest soil nitrate concentrations but did not consistently have greatest forage biomass.

ANR for the slurry treatments ranged from 35 to 70% when calculations were based on ammonium-N concentration, compared with 31 to 65% for urea.

Slurry ANR calculated on a total N basis was lower (15 to 40%) due to lower availability of the organic N in the slurries.

No consistent differences in soil microbial biomass or other biological indicators were observed.

Anaerobically digested slurry supported equal forage production and similar N use efficiency when compared to raw dairy slurry.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Saunders, Olivia E.& Fortuna, Ann-Marie& Harrison, Joe H.& Whitefield, Elizabeth& Cogger, Craig G.& Kennedy, Ann C.…[et al.]. 2012. Comparison of Raw Dairy Manure Slurry and Anaerobically Digested Slurry as N Sources for Grass Forage Production. International Journal of Agronomy،Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-446353

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Saunders, Olivia E.…[et al.]. Comparison of Raw Dairy Manure Slurry and Anaerobically Digested Slurry as N Sources for Grass Forage Production. International Journal of Agronomy No. 2012 (2012), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-446353

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Saunders, Olivia E.& Fortuna, Ann-Marie& Harrison, Joe H.& Whitefield, Elizabeth& Cogger, Craig G.& Kennedy, Ann C.…[et al.]. Comparison of Raw Dairy Manure Slurry and Anaerobically Digested Slurry as N Sources for Grass Forage Production. International Journal of Agronomy. 2012. Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-446353

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-446353