![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Comparison of an Automated System with Conventional Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
المؤلفون المشاركون
Chugh, Tulsi Das
Tandon, Neha
Deb, Manorama
Duggal, Shalini
Gaind, Rajni
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2012، العدد 2012 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2012)، ص ص. 1-4، 4ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2012-09-16
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
4
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
The present study was designed to compare a fully automated identification/antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) system BD Phoenix (BD) for its efficacy in rapid and accurate identification and AST with conventional manual methods and to determine if the errors reported in AST, such as the (very major errors) VME (false susceptibility), (major errors) ME (false resistance), and (minor errors) MiE (intermediate category interpretation) were within the range certified by FDA.
Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test results of eighty-five clinical isolates including both gram-positive and negative were compared on Phoenix considering the results obtained from conventional manual methods of identification and disc diffusion testing of antibiotics as standards for comparison.
Phoenix performed favorably well.
There was 100% concordance in identification for gram-negative isolates and 94.83% for gram-positive isolates.
In seven cases, Phoenix proved better than conventional identification.
For antibiotic results, categorical agreement was 98.02% for gram-positive and 95.7% for gram-negative isolates.
VME was 0.33%, ME 0.66%, MiE 0.99% for gram-positive isolates and 1.23% VME, 1.23% ME, and 1.85% MiE for gram-negative isolates.
Therefore, this automated system can be used as a tool to facilitate early identification and susceptibility pattern of aerobic bacteria in routine microbiology laboratories.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Duggal, Shalini& Gaind, Rajni& Tandon, Neha& Deb, Manorama& Chugh, Tulsi Das. 2012. Comparison of an Automated System with Conventional Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. ISRN Microbiology،Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-446946
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Duggal, Shalini…[et al.]. Comparison of an Automated System with Conventional Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. ISRN Microbiology No. 2012 (2012), pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-446946
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Duggal, Shalini& Gaind, Rajni& Tandon, Neha& Deb, Manorama& Chugh, Tulsi Das. Comparison of an Automated System with Conventional Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. ISRN Microbiology. 2012. Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-446946
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-446946
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)